
BOOYSEN SAID IT WAS AN “ABUSE OF PROCESS”.
THE NKABINDE REPORT TELLS A DIFFERENT STORY. Johan Booysen was very confident when he dismissed the Nkabinde Inquiry. He called it an “abuse of process.” He dismissed Aris Danikas’s evidence as old material. He said the courts had already dealt with it. The message was clear: Nothing to see here. Move on. But the inquiry did not simply move on. It heard Danikas. It examined the evidence. It heard forensic evidence. And now the Nkabinde Report has said something Booysen’s version cannot simply explain away: the idea that there was “no evidence” was unsubstantiated. Let that sink in. This does not mean Booysen was found guilty. He wasn’t. It does mean that the easy dismissal of Danikas and the Cato Manor allegations has been seriously undermined. And that is where News24/City Press also have a problem. It gave Booysen a platform to call the inquiry an “abuse of process”. Now

















