GLOBAL CORRUPTION AND PUBLIC INTEGRITY: THE HUMAN FACTOR

Fav Icon

Anti-SLAPP Directive: CASE statement on the political agreement

Anti-SLAPP Directive - CASE statement on the political agreement

https://www.the-case.eu/latest/anti-slapp-directive-case-statement-on-the-political-agreement/

On 30 November 2023, the Council and Parliament of the EU  reached an agreement on a proposed anti-SLAPP directive. The press releases and informal information we have received about the final text indicate that the final version includes several positive developments that represent a win for the years-long advocacy efforts of CASE and its members. The anti-SLAPP Directive of the EU will set new rules to protect those targeted with strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP), such as journalists, rights defenders or civil society organisations.

CASE is encouraged to learn that the EU negotiators deflected some of the attempts of the EU Council to dilute key safeguards. We remain determined to see robust measures to protect public watchdogs against abusive lawsuits, forming the tenets of the first EU-wide anti-SLAPP law. We hope that the new rules will become a trailblazing example for countries also beyond the EU.

When Daphne Caruana Galizia was brutally assassinated in 2017, several civil society organisations embarked on a journey to ensure that the unfathomable vilification that happened to Daphne who was facing 48 abusive lawsuits at the time of her murder, would not repeat itself. Our advocacy, research and awareness-raising campaigns contributed to building recognition of the malicious character and dire impact of SLAPPs and pronounced the need to put forward robust measures to tackle them.

Years of advocacy have borne significant fruit. In April 2022, the European Commission introduced an anti-SLAPP initiative, which included the core recommendations we had advocated for such as an early dismissal mechanism and compensation of damages. We contributed to a policy brief that fleshed out the strengths and weaknesses of the unveiled proposal as well as priorities for potential amendments. 

To pass into law, the proposed directive by the Commission had to be approved by the other two key institutions of the EU: the European Parliament and the European Council. The general approach the European Council agreed on in June 2023 heavily watered down the EC proposal which already set the minimum benchmark for anti-SLAPP legislation. CASE and its members have subsequently sounded the alarm through advocacy meetings at national and international level and through campaigning – that a robust anti-SLAPP Directive must encompass: an early dismissal mechanism for all SLAPPs; a broad notion of cross-border cases and compensation of damages.

By enabling national courts to dismiss SLAPPs in an accelerated procedure early in proceedings, the text of the EU Directive as approved on 30 November 2023 promises to contain these guarantees. It also contains a broad concept of SLAPPs on matters with cross-border implications and it aims to deter potential claimants from engaging in such practices. Where it falls short is in deferring excessively to member states and relying on ambiguous language in relation to certain key safeguards and remedies: it will, for example, be for member states to decide whether compensation will be available to public watchdogs, or to flesh out the threshold test used to dismiss SLAPPs.

CASE therefore emphasises that, while these measures constitute an important and positive step forward, they should be considered the minimum standards needed to protect public watchdogs against SLAPPs. CASE will therefore be monitoring transposition closely in line with the standards we have previously articulated – and, we hope, in line with a Council of Europe recommendation on SLAPPs, due to be discussed in Strasbourg next month.  

This Directive (also referred to as ‘Daphne’s law’) is to be implemented by the EU Member States and it forms a package together with the Commission’s horizontal Recommendation on anti-SLAPP, which was adopted in April 2022.  It’s a historic moment that will determine further efforts to counter abusive litigation at national level. We once again express appreciation for Věra Jourová, European Commission Vice-President for Values and Transparency and Tiemo Wölken MEP and rapporteur for their incessant dedication to see an ambitious EU-wide anti-SLAPP framework materialise. We await the final text for detailed analysis and comments. CASE commits to continue its work to see the essential protections effectively being enacted in Member States.

Facebook
X(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email

Similar Topics

The Novartis Scandal: Ethical Implications and Legal Conflict

The Novartis scandal represents a significant chapter in the ongoing discourse surrounding ethicsin the pharmaceutical sector, particularly in relation to allegations of corruption and bribery. Thisanalysis explores the intricacies of the scandal, the penalties imposed by U.S. authorities, theconflicts arising from the legal frameworks of Greece and the United States and the implicationsthese differences have an effect on the protection status of whistleblowers.

Discover More »

Participation in the Workplace Institute conference in September 2024, which is being hosted by Whistleblowers of America.

For the second year, we participated and engaged with congressional staffers and prominent veteran whistleblowers at the US Capitol in DC.Emphasis was given to multiple problems whistleblowers are facing on a global scale. https://www.workplacepromiseinstitute.org/wpi-conference/2024-agenda https://www.workplacepromiseinstitute.org/wpi-conference/2024-agenda/aris-danikas-24

Discover More »
Photo Yasmine

Yasmine Motarjemi, “I always fight a triple battle, legal, media and scientific”

Kyrgyz writer established in Geneva, Zhenishbek Edigeev spoke on June 28, 2024 with Yasmine Motarjemi ( photo DR ), a specialist in food poisoning. After a hard struggle, this whistleblower won a lawsuit against Nestlé but this victory leaves her with a bitter taste. Yes, I won, but it is a very bitter victory. Very bitter because initially, my fight focused on food safety management. In fact, my termination letter states that I was fired for my opinions. So, it was indeed a matter of food safety. During the process, I was harassed for my opinions before being fired. I could have been fired immediately if my opinions did not suit the group, but the group chose to harass me for four years to destroy me psychologically and socially, and ruin my career. In Switzerland, you know, you can fire someone with three months’ salary. It’s very easy to lay

Discover More »
GLOBAL CORRUPTION AND PUBLIC INTEGRITY

diavlos.grnet.gr – PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IMPACTS: THE HUMAN FACTOR

In recent years, retaliation against whistleblowers has evolved. Silencing those who speak the truth against corruption at the place of work further promotes corruption. The use of strategic litigation against public participation (SLAPP) has been weaponized against whistleblowers, advocates, journalists, and NGOs. Introducing new legislation in Europe that identifies and seizes SLAPP suits as a form of retaliation against whistleblowers is crucial for combating corruption. There is an urgent need to reform current legislation and educate the judiciary community in order to prevent SLAPP suits retaliating against those who serve the public interest. Legal experts from around the globe will be analyzing, comparing, and criticizing the different international legislations on public disclosures. Whistleblowers and their families are subjected to silent, chronic psychological retaliation that can cause post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Retaliation such as bullying at the place of work, social isolation, persecution, and financial strain often results in PTSD. The

Discover More »
error: Content is protected !!