GLOBAL CORRUPTION AND PUBLIC INTEGRITY: THE HUMAN FACTOR

Fav Icon

Ari Danikas (Greece/South Africa) 2016 SPECIAL RECOGNITION AWARD

Ari Danikas (Greece:South Africa) 2016 SPECIAL RECOGNITION AWARD

Ari Danikas was a police reserve officer in the Cato Manor unit of the South African police. This unit typically deals with violent crime, including armed robbery, cash-in-transit robberies, the protection of politicians, kidnapping, drug trafficking, murder investigations, and organized criminal gangs. They are an elite unit of the South African Police. Through the publication of a series of videos and public revelations, Danikas revealed that the unit was allegedly engaged in extrajudicial killing, tampering with crime scenes, and the torture of subjects.

In 2012, working with South Africa’s Sunday Times journalists Stephan Hofstatter and Mzilikazi wa Afrika (and with support from a third journalist, Rob Rose), Danikas had his disclosures published. This followed the initial posting of a series of videos forming part of the disclosure to YouTube in 2009. Following the initial Sunday Times pieces, the trio published a series of stories and produced a documentary with Al Jazeera focusing on the allegations.

Collectively, Danikas’ disclosure and the subsequent series of articles reveal serious allegations against the Cato Manor squad. Over a period of many years, the members of the Cato Manor police squad — based in Durban, South Africa — have allegedly been involved in a number of illegal and unethical practices. These have allegedly included extra-judicial killing, torture, and the ‘setting up’ of crimes where a tip-off was given to the squad in advance of a crime, and then the squad ambushed the suspects with over-zealous use of force.

Additionally, the squad was allegedly involved in the tampering of crime scenes by planting weapons, re-arranging corpses, cleaning gunpowder residue, and other forensic manipulation. Danikas also documented at least one occasion where a suspect was reportedly tortured in police custody. A particularly graphic disclosure was a video in which it appears officers shot a suspect and let him bleed to death in a garage.

Blueprint does not imply the guilt of any party at this time. The allegations brought against the squad should be dealt with in a transparent manner. Danikas’ evidence will be critical in an investigation of members of the squad. The allegations of continued violence, sustained over time, against low-income black South Africans are serious enough to need an impartial judicial review led by a panel of eminent jurists, such as retired judges from an international court, who are completely independent of the complex party politics of South Africa.

Before the initial publication of the videos as part of his disclosure in 2009, Danikas fled to his native country, Greece, in fear for his life. He is still subjected to threats and intimidation as a result of his disclosure.

Danikas’ disclosure raises numerous public interest matters that deserve proper independent investigation; extra-judicial killing by an arm of the state offends the basic rights of any citizen. It is important for the citizenry to be able to have confidence in the rule of law, and those who enforce it.

This case is an excellent demonstration of a whistleblower and journalists working together to get information from secretive places into the public domain. It also highlights how journalists should be handling sensitive whistleblower sources, by protecting their anonymity, and not abandoning them as soon as the story is published.

Danikas has demonstrated bravery in stepping forward in a dangerous environment to speak out and should be recognised for his sacrifice.

https://www.blueprintforfreespeech.net/en/prize/recipients/2016/ari-danikas ( PDF )

Facebook
X(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email

Similar Topics

RIP, Whislteblower worrier, The remarkable story of ED SCHRANK

WORKPLACE PROMISE INSTITUTE 2024 Washington, DC On the 11th of September 2024, we traveled to the Capitol in Washington, DC, discussing various legislation regarding the USA whistleblowing protection act. Members of Congress engaged with us. The singing of the USA national anthem by disabled veteran, whistleblower, and remarkable man, Ed Schrank, was a memorable event that left us both in admiration and sadness.                 At the time of his retirement from the United States Marine Corps, Ed was a Gunnery Sergeant. Ed is a 6-time head and neck cancer survivor from chemical exposure while serving 15 years in the United States Marine Corps. He was diagnosed with lacrimal adenocarcinoma (tear duct cancer) in 2006 after being exposed to toxic chemicals in military jet fuel from January 1998 to May 2003; during the latter part of this period, Ed was stationed in Afghanistan, where he performed extra hazardous duties. The physician

Discover More »

The Novartis Scandal: Ethical Implications and Legal Conflict

The Novartis scandal represents a significant chapter in the ongoing discourse surrounding ethicsin the pharmaceutical sector, particularly in relation to allegations of corruption and bribery. Thisanalysis explores the intricacies of the scandal, the penalties imposed by U.S. authorities, theconflicts arising from the legal frameworks of Greece and the United States and the implicationsthese differences have an effect on the protection status of whistleblowers.

Discover More »

Participation in the Workplace Institute conference in September 2024, which is being hosted by Whistleblowers of America.

For the second year, we participated and engaged with congressional staffers and prominent veteran whistleblowers at the US Capitol in DC.Emphasis was given to multiple problems whistleblowers are facing on a global scale. https://www.workplacepromiseinstitute.org/wpi-conference/2024-agenda https://www.workplacepromiseinstitute.org/wpi-conference/2024-agenda/aris-danikas-24

Discover More »
Photo Yasmine

Yasmine Motarjemi, “I always fight a triple battle, legal, media and scientific”

Kyrgyz writer established in Geneva, Zhenishbek Edigeev spoke on June 28, 2024 with Yasmine Motarjemi ( photo DR ), a specialist in food poisoning. After a hard struggle, this whistleblower won a lawsuit against Nestlé but this victory leaves her with a bitter taste. Yes, I won, but it is a very bitter victory. Very bitter because initially, my fight focused on food safety management. In fact, my termination letter states that I was fired for my opinions. So, it was indeed a matter of food safety. During the process, I was harassed for my opinions before being fired. I could have been fired immediately if my opinions did not suit the group, but the group chose to harass me for four years to destroy me psychologically and socially, and ruin my career. In Switzerland, you know, you can fire someone with three months’ salary. It’s very easy to lay

Discover More »
error: Content is protected !!